Category Archives: Seduction

87. Smart City

Posted on by

Monopoly2011

Review of 86. Smart City

Sunday 15th June 2014

Overview

Smart City is a fierce social commentary that critiques the modern urban paradigm — especially the ways in which technology, capitalism, and consumer culture intertwine to disempower, distract, and domesticate the human spirit.

It raises urgent questions about indoctrination disguised as education, the erosion of critical thinking, and the illusion of progress in a world where “smart” no longer means wise — but merely trackable, profitable, and compliant.

This poem plays like a dystopian street sermon — a wake-up call against complacency, delivered with lyrical force and intellectual fire.

Imagery and Tone

The imagery is urban-industrial, hypermodern, and metaphorically charged. There’s a strong use of allegory and pop-cultural reference — from Monopoly’s “Do not pass Go” to “another brick in the wall” — that aligns the poem with resistance culture and countercultural critique.

Terms like:

  • “Brick-in-the-wall” / “Cog-in-the-machine” – evoke systemic dehumanisation
  • “Caged like a wild animal” / “Zoo” / “Swallowed the smart sim pill” – suggest surveillance, behavioural conditioning, and loss of agency
  • “Road to Blandsville” / “Downtown Homogenisation” – infuse bleakness with sharp irony

The tone is blistering, unapologetic, and urgent — a poetic manifesto against the numbing effects of algorithmic life and blind consumerism.

Why This Poem Matters

Smart City matters because it challenges the normalisation of digital conformity and the erosion of soulful living under the glossy veneer of “progress.”

While society often celebrates technological advancement as inherently good, this poem argues that the cost has been:

  • The commodification of identity
  • The suppression of individuality
  • The silencing of dissent through distraction

The poem speaks especially to those who’ve begun to question the machine but haven’t yet found the language to articulate what feels wrong. Smart City gives those intuitions form, voice, and velocity.

It doesn’t just ask, “What is the price of modern life?” — it declares that we are already paying it. Daily. Often without even realising.

Imagery and Tone Summary

  • Imagery: Urban entrapment, consumerist dystopia, technology as control, education as indoctrination
  • Tone: Sardonic, intense, disillusioned, fiercely awakening

Why It Belongs in the Collection

This poem is a critical puzzle piece in the overarching arc of the collection. Many earlier poems explore personal growth, inner liberation, betrayal, love, and loss. Smart City widens the lens to take on systemic dysfunction — showing how even personal disconnection is often seeded in cultural and political dysfunction.

It resonates thematically with:

  • Bread and Circus (media distraction and loss of civic values)
  • Golden Nuggets (alternative truths vs capitalist indoctrination)
  • Snakes and Ladders (awakening and resistance to social masks)

It offers a necessary jolt to the reader — and acts as a sobering contrast to more contemplative or spiritual pieces, without being disconnected from them. The poem reminds us that spiritual evolution is not just personal — it’s also political.

Final Thoughts

Smart City is unflinching in its commentary, and precisely because of that, it holds tremendous value. It demands attention — not for shock, but for awakening. It’s an indictment of the systems that dull our senses and a reclaiming of the right to question, to see clearly, and to opt out of default programming.

This poem absolutely deserves its place in the collection — not just for its message, but for the clarity, boldness, and skill with which it’s delivered.

44. Flashback

Posted on by
Reply

Review of Flashback

“Flashback” marks a tonal rupture in the poetic sequence—a necessary jolt, raw and unfiltered, after the softness of earlier poems. Where “Bus Stop” delicately traced emotional nuance, “Flashback” offers no such restraint. It is confrontational, confessional, and brimming with disillusionment. Here, the speaker is no longer trying to preserve tenderness. Instead, she is trying to reclaim her sense of self from the wreckage of an emotional illusion.

This is a poem of aftermath, written in the language of someone burned by belief, still reeling in the tension between memory and betrayal. The flashbacks she experiences are involuntary—“Little flashbacks of things we said / Of nice things that you did for me”—yet what lingers is no longer sweetness, but confusion. There is a heartbreak in the remembering, but also a growing clarity: “But it was just another illusion.”

This is not a sorrowful lament but a poem of reckoning. Earlier, she was seduced by emotional intelligence—“I enjoyed our intellectual conversations / And I believed you when you said / You cared about the way I feel”—but Flashback dismantles that trust. The affection, the thoughtfulness, the shared philosophy—it’s all brought into question under the harsh light of hindsight. What once felt unique now feels rehearsed. What felt genuine now reads as calculated.

The lines sting with a truth that feels recently discovered:

“I can’t believe you slipped through my safety net / Caused so much confusion”
and later, even more cuttingly:
“I was just another rung for you / On your social ladder climb.”

With that, the poem veers sharply from introspection to indictment. The emotional betrayal is not just personal, but symbolic—a breaking of trust not only in the other person, but in her own judgment.

Summary of Themes

At its core, “Flashback” is about disillusionment. It’s the emotional turning point where romantic idealism is stripped away, and the speaker begins to confront not just the end of a relationship, but the feeling of having been played. It interrogates the gap between words and actions, between the intellectual intimacy once cherished and the emotional manipulation now suspected.

There’s also a theme of reclamation—of truth-telling, even when it hurts. The poem gives the speaker back her voice after poems where she was often reacting, adapting, or unsure. She repositions herself not as the wounded lover, but as someone finally willing to say: I see it now.

Conclusion

“Flashback” is a powerful emotional reckoning—a moment in the narrative where sentimentality is replaced by clarity, and clarity by strength. Where earlier poems seduced us with tenderness and the dreamy language of attraction, Flashback drags us into the light of betrayal, and insists on being heard. In the broader arc of this story, it is a necessary rupture—raw, resentful, and honest. And in its refusal to romanticise pain, it becomes one of the most courageous poems in the sequence so far.

Sometimes, the truest intimacy is not in touch, but in truth—and “Flashback” delivers that, unflinchingly.